1857.

third.-Brand new fourth anniversary from Legal “Crown and you will Anchor” A beneficial.O.F. had been popular by the a food in the Uncle. Franklin’s, Hallway Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood filled this new chair, and it are reported that the newest Judge following contains ninety players.

The month of january

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, Roentgen. R. B. Norman, Burton, and you may J. Bayly ended up being picked the fresh new members of anyone Library Committee.

p. 207 You off a great whale, that was drawn at Winterton, had been shown on the Church Plain.

The Rev. W. D. Wade, this new minister off St. Mary’s, Southtown, had, before you leave Southsea, come served with a wallet away from ?61.

twenty-first.-The brand new “Sisters” is in the crash which have among the many brick piers off the latest Link, that it had considerably busted.

Feb. next.-An Anti-Taxation meeting was actually kept during the City Hall. The new Mayor https://getbride.org/no/dominikanske-kvinner/ presided, in addition to pursuing the took part in what is happening:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, R. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer looked like the mover within this number.

Feb. 21st.-An excellent “Poor’s Rates” conference was actually kept during the Masonic Hall. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and you may a resolution protesting resistant to the 1s. 6d. quarterly rate try then followed. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Royal, Roentgen. Bailey, Nichols, and you can F. Starling spoke on the subject, as the conduct of Guardians is defended from the Mr. J. H. Harrison, one of the Board.

Feb. 25th.-A case and that delighted considerable appeal, had been heard from the Condition Court, Tolhouse-hall, until the Court (T. J. Birch, Esq.) The new plaintiff try Mr. John Cobb, fabric provider, for who Mr. C. H. Chamberlin searched; the newest defendants was in fact Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you can G. D. Palmer, who have been depicted from the Mr. J. L. Cufaude. The new plaintiff reported that he was an applicant towards place of work of Councillor to your age like from the solicitation out of Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you can G. D. Palmer. At the time the guy became a candidate he extremely advised all of them which he wouldn’t pay from his own pocket a great deal more than simply ?10 towards expenses of one’s election, plus it was know that Liberal people, that he belonged, manage subscribe others. The night before election he acquired a price away from what the expense was indeed more likely, plus consequence of that he at a time spotted one another Mr. Burroughs and you will Mr. G. D. Palmer. You to definitely guess, he thought, amounted to help you throughout the ?forty five, because the subscriptions completely amounted to help you but ?42. After certain dialogue it agreed to keep him harmless of one’s amount of the expense which could go beyond the sum of the licensed, in which he and you may Mr. Burroughs then went p. 208 on the Committee-room of one’s Northern-ward, in which Mr. Burroughs told you that they had produced preparations due to their friend John Cobb effective the market-ward. The expense of election, that he (the plaintiff) forgotten, amounted altogether to help you ?58 1s. 7d. The bill, for this reason, which he now stated on the defendants is ?sixteen 1s. 7d.-The plaintiff, within the get across-examination of the Mr. Cufaude, admitted one to ?39 of your entire count try getting – -.-Mr. Cufaude contended that in case, as the plaintiff stated, brand new defendants got given him a vow into excess expenses, the brand new make sure must come in writing. And you will, while evidence try correct, and this, although not, he debated, it absolutely was impossible towards the plaintiff to recoup, inasmuch when he themselves got greeting you to a large part off the entire expenditures are having – -, which had been an illegal act.-Mr. Chamberlin argued that the plaintiff, once receiving the fresh promise throughout the defendants, acted simply up on the brand new faith of the hope, and therefore hence, as they had joined up on a wedding to invest the cash, they certainly were liable. The bucks, furthermore, had not been invested by the plaintiff, however, by panel designated to perform the brand new election, and you can until the election try more, the new plaintiff was not conscious some of the money got already been invested inside – -.-Their Honor told you it absolutely was clear the guarantee need come written down. He had been away from opinion, in addition to, your plaintiff wasn’t bound to spend the money for unlawful costs, and consequently he might not bring his action for the money he said.-New plaintiff is actually, accordingly, non-recommended.